As much as I want to keep on the side of defending fighters in mma, this story cannot be seen from any other angle except the one portrayed. Heavyweight fighter Brett Rogers was arrested under a warrant for “third degree felony assault in a domestic violence incident against his wife” (Al-Shatti). No matter what background a person comes from, this is unacceptable.
Dana White, UFC owner and Zuffa official, “immediately terminated the 30-year-old from the Strikeforce heavyweight roster” (Al-Shatti). This was a good move because it shows that the president the UFC believes in justice, and that leagues will not tolerate uncontrolled violence outside of the sport.
In a way this is sort of a rhetorical appeal to the audience of the sport. It lets them know that things will not get out of hand under their control, and if something bad happens, they will take care of it. This reminds me of Andrew’s blog on “Violence Developed within sports” when he talks about the fight between two football teams. In the same way the NCAA will be praised for suspending 10 players, Dana White will be praised for terminating Roger’s contract.
The last thing to look at is whether or not the sport is what led to this violent act. It is safe to say that the sport gave him the tools to carry it out, but it would be controversial to say that the sport made him a violent person. If a baseball player were to hurt someone with a bat one would say the sport gave him the tools: his bat, strength, and swinging technique, but no one would say the sport made him violent. Similarly, mma gave Rogers the tools to hurt someone, but it is his actions that led him to prison, not his tools.
http://mma.sbnation.com/2011/10/25/2513387/brett-rogers-arrest-warrant-strikeforce-mma-news
http://mma.sbnation.com/2011/10/25/2513387/brett-rogers-arrest-warrant-strikeforce-mma-news